Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DWNC-TV
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Eddie891 Talk Work 14:22, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- DWNC-TV (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Generally unnotable local station. This article only has 17 words of readable prose, and the entire article is completely unsourced. A WP:BEFORE shows no WP:SIGCOV of the station (I can only find Fandom wiki entries for the station).
I recommend redirecting this article to List of Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation channels and stations per WP:ATD-R. The current prose is not mergeable since it merely states that the station is owned by IBC and is inactive. AstrooKai (Talk) 12:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Companies, and Philippines. AstrooKai (Talk) 12:48, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete no reliable sources found on GSearch, GBooks, GScholar and GNews --Lenticel (talk) 00:44, 7 February 2025 (UTC)
- Don't you think it is more suitable to have it redirected to List of Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation channels and stations, per WP:ATD-R? AstrooKai (Talk) 11:44, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- Normally I'm fine with ATD if we can find an actual reliable citation supporting the redirect. But these stations are rife with hoaxes so I think it's better to be safe with deletion than sorry. --Lenticel (talk) 07:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Alright. AstrooKai (Talk) 10:18, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Normally I'm fine with ATD if we can find an actual reliable citation supporting the redirect. But these stations are rife with hoaxes so I think it's better to be safe with deletion than sorry. --Lenticel (talk) 07:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)
- Don't you think it is more suitable to have it redirected to List of Intercontinental Broadcasting Corporation channels and stations, per WP:ATD-R? AstrooKai (Talk) 11:44, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.