Talk:Epsilon Sagittarii

Latest comment: 1 month ago by 21.Andromedae in topic Evoltionary stage
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Epsilon Sagittarii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Epsilon Sagittarii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Epsilon Sagittarii. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 22 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Trinary?

edit

Is this binary (confirmed) but suspected Trinary? is the additional companion orbiting B or A/B? Mastakos (talk) 07:04, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

An unseen (spectroscopic?) companion would be Aa, but that is just a random suggestion for some unexplained properties. There are two additional (possible) companions that have been published and I've added mentions of those. One appears to be purely optical, and one is so far separated that it would be considered co-moving rather than gravitationally bound. Just to add to the confusion, the WDS lists the 2.3" companion as component C and the (unrelated) 32" companion as component B (by order of discovery?). The CCDM lists only the 2.3" companion, obviously as component B. I have skipped over this discrepancy in the article as the main reference refers to it as B. Lithopsian (talk) 15:29, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Evoltionary stage

edit

It seems Epsilon Sagittari is not a subgiant (or giant) star in the sense it evolved from a once smaller star. According to Bailey et al. (2024), it is more like the merger of a once binary star, as stated in the abstract. 21 Andromedae (talk) 15:56, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Also, i added this to this article some months ago. 21 Andromedae (talk) 15:58, 7 March 2025 (UTC)Reply